After removing the program, some of its related processes still run on the computer.The program is not listed in the Windows Settings or Control Panel.The program is regarded by the user and/or some websites as a potentially malicious.The program is being re-installed (uninstalled and installed again afterwards).The program is not as good as the user expected.The program crashes or hangs periodically/frequently.The program is not compatible with other installed applications. These are the main reasons why XMLmind XML Editor is uninstalled by users: Some experience issues during uninstallation, whereas other encounter problems after the program is removed. It seems that there are many users who have difficulty uninstalling programs like XMLmind XML Editor from their systems. What usually makes people to uninstall XMLmind XML Editor This guide will provide you with detailed instructions and all the information that you require to remove and uninstall Regular users don't like markup based editing.XMLMax is a straightforward and efficient piece of software that provides you with all the necessary tools for editing large XML files.Īre you having trouble uninstalling XMLmind XML Editor?Īre you looking for a solution that will completely uninstall and remove all of its files from your computer? Just saying that I know where you're coming from, but try the Word route - it works much better in practice than all the 'pure' text-based solutions that are out there. I was very reluctant to go this route at first too, because I wanted a solution that was more 'technically perfect', but I realized over time that having happy and productive users was more important. Sticking to something they know (Word) will prevent you many headaches. If they are just slightly not-technical, DocBook or Latex aren't going to work (I've tried giving my users both, and I even tried Epic Editor as a DocBook editor which is very expensive but didn't work out very well after all). Your users are going to want a visual diff tool that resembles the one they are editing in. TortoiseSVN comes with scripts to compare different revisions of Word documents, in Word itself (Word has a version compare tool). Help Producer makes help files from Word documents. You can use Subversion and MGTEK Help Producer. This is where the open source options gain support on a corporate level. there are also the arguments that locking your documentation into a "sticky" or closed format doesn't help the future maintenance requirements. Some of the extreme advice you will get comes from people and companies that have been exposed to the value of XML documentation, and especially those in the realms of DITA, where certain multi-nationals have a reputation for acquisitions that are influenced by the format and availability of the product knowledge. As you would know, there's a market out there for "Technical Writers" who specialize in fixing Microsoft Word styles (and markup), so the arguments for separating "authoring" from "publishing" are based on proven but distinct use cases for organizations that require documentation to be held up to the same standards of the engineering/programming/source production. Your writers might want WYSIWYG (and can have it), and depending on your documentation needs, this might be what you end up using. The major "con" is the perception of technicality. Obviously your writers can use a WYSIWYG like Serna, but I use snippets in Geany (on Fedora) or TextMate (on OS X) personally. Publican is a great publishing tool that can take DocBook XML, and publish it to PDF, HTML, HTML-single, etc. Subversion is a very common version control tool, that like DocBook is relatively easy to implement and use. All of which will be able to (but might not want to) write in XML, and picking up DocBook is like picking up HTML in the 90's. The major "pro" here is that these are freely available tools, with a strong overlap in the market of technical writers. Most (and close to all) of Red Hat's official documentation is created in such a manner. A good combination to consider is Subversion, DocBook and Publican.Īt the moment, this is one of the toolchains in use by the world's largest provider of open source solutions, and the name behind much of the world's use of Linux-based operation systems in the enterprise market.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |